Why T1 owns a series of "disaster" parameters, losing to the player is being the weakest assessment

Perhaps the data collection screen of T1 needs to end.
The "tragic" parameters of the star T1 at LCK Cup 2025
In the LCK Cup 2025 phase, T1 had a surprise replacement when pushing Gumayusi on the bench and replaced Smash - the gunner was rising from the T1 Challengers team. However, this replacement did not seem to bring anything positive.
The "data collection" of T1 has been difficult to accept.
The controversy surrounding is not enough, and it is the result of T1 when they only finish the LCK Cup 2025 in rank 6, lose the opportunity to attend First Stand and appear Smash information daring to "turn on" Faker. But the "disaster" is even more the series of young T1 stars even though the whole team has played around this player.

Compared to other gunner in the top 6, Smash can be seen with high gold, soldiers or KDA but the damage index causes serious difference.
Specifically, despite having a very high index of KDA, the amount of gold/minute, the damage/minute metabolic index or the damage rate (on the opponent/on the pillar) of SMash is extremely low, creating a clear difference. Even if compared to a gunner, it is considered to be the weakest and the most outstanding form at the LCK Cup 2025 is Deokdam, Smash's damage transformation index is also worse (129.3% compared to 150.3%).

Easy to understand, T1 almost completely created and Smash just ended to get the life to defeat - Photo: In the 2.0 life.
T1 needs to terminate the data collection before the Regular Seasons start

Fans are also bored with the parameters of young T1 stars chosen to replace Gumayusi in the last LCK Cup.