Not only Gumayusi but also Smash will be able to suffer the consequences of T1's moves.

T1 - Gumayusi: The consequences are right before the eyes

In the drama T1 - Gumayusi this time, it can be said that the gunner was born in 2002 as the first and most obvious "victim". It was T1 admitting that they let Gumayusi choose between "seeing teammate Scrim" and "climbing rank". Everyone knows Gumayusi's choice later. Thus, first, Gumayusi was deprived of a player's basic benefit: practicing.

Gumayusi was deprived of the basic rights of a player who was practiced at the LCK Cup recently.

After that, it was the T1 CEO that "Gumayusi must compete and have to prove it to have an official capacity". But perhaps, because this is Gumayusi, whom itself has many negative opinions towards him, this sentence of the new CEO T1 also receives support.

If in exchange for any legend or superstar in the position of the gunner, such as Bang or Ruler, for example, there will certainly be the opposite questions for CEO T1: Why is a gunner 2 of World Championships in a row that must be proved while the gunner that the highest position is the top 4 Challengers, does not hear anything about having to show better?

T1 always emphasized that "Gumayusi must prove and show" but what is it proving that there is no current gunner that can have the same achievement like him?

In addition, it is a doubt for Gumayusi increasing. Obviously, there have been many opinions that "Gumayusi is poorly practicing, so they are replaced". And it was the BLD T1 implicitly confirmed that Gumayusi was not trained during the replacement Smash. However, for a part of the audience, what they have thought is right, it will still be true, even though Gumayusi himself has confirmed over and over again, even achieving achievements in the entire League of Legends realms today, no one can play as achievements like him.

And T1's work caused anti-fans to have unjustly criticized criticism towards Gumayusi.

T1 - Smash: long -term consequences

First, Smash may only have an error in this drama if the images/clips about his attitude towards seniors are real. In addition, in terms of replacing Gumayusi, Smash is in a passive position because this is the decision of the BLD as well as the coach. However, he is a character who criticized no less than Gumayusi. Only thing, this player is only a rookie at this year's LCK.

That is, even in the early stages of the official career for the first team. Even some anti-fans also send gifts to Smash and BLD T1 still received. It can be said that, instead of looking at Smash's career journey independently, many people use to "drown" Gumayusi or show hatred to this player.

At the present time, perhaps Smash's real fans are less than the number of anti-fans Gumayusi but want to "rely on" Smash to attack his senior.

These actions, seemingly supporting Smash, but in fact, this player has almost no fan file is his own. Meanwhile, T1 benefits (from Goods or Merch related to Smash bought by these "fans" and Gumayusi's anti-fans have the opportunity to show the "cyber violence" hiding his own support.

And this is absolutely not good for Smash's development. No one knows that once Gumayusi really leaves T1, Smash has the current enthusiastic support, or he will become a "second" Gumayusi ". But even things would be worse, if T1 decided to rotate him with the gunner born in 2002 and T1 empty -handed in this season.