Only a few matches but VCS continued to become the topic of discussion after the former player's statement.

There is information VCS has a "problem" from the former VCS player 

In these days, besides the main tournaments of the regions, VCS has also returned with a series of strange names but also quite familiar. Except for the Flash team that almost retains the squad, the remaining teams participating in the VCS to promote LCP are quite new but there are many names that have ever battle in the highest tournament in Vietnam. However, the problem arises after only a few matches.

Accordingly, after the match between Team Flash and Hyper Vortex Esports closed, there was information from a former "smelled" former player. Of course, the denunciation side merely has a post that attracts the attention of the male player. However, only that is enough for the Vietnamese League of Legends community to explode.

While many fans expressed their agreement with the subjective judgment above, even providing evidence that in the match, there were really problems, many fans expressed neutral attitude if not somewhat "anti -damage" with the opinion affecting VCS. Meanwhile, the owner of the post does not give any evidence.

The negative information appears in the tournament after only a few matches.

Perhaps the case "32 players" really haunted VCS fans 

Normally, in the previous matches of League of Vietnam, the comments were somewhat joking about "investigating the player" that had appeared whenever the team failed or the players had "blind" handling phases. However, after the "32 players" incident, these opinions were somewhat joking but often brought a frank condemnation even though sometimes there was no clear basis.

The VCS community also sells the suspicion.

However, this non -evidence information is enough to make VCS audiences bewildered. In particular, if they come from the characters who have more or less participated in VCS, it is easier to attract the attention of the community.

Negative information about VCS, although it is attracting a lot of discussion, there is no clear evidence. The audience needs to be alert, avoid affecting the team, players and images of the tournament as well as related individuals and collectives.